Abstract
Systematic reviews and meta-analysis are affected by the studies that are included or excluded. A number of biases are common, including excluding unpublished data, non-English language publications, and non-indexed articles. In addition, there can be a differential impact based on the quality and comparability of studies. In this article, we review the potential significance of these biases. Psychopharmacology Bulletin. 2003;37(4):88-91.
Keywords
dataevidencemeta-analysispooledpublication bias
Access This Article
Choose an access option below to view the full article.
How to Cite
K. Ranga Rama Krishnan, MB, ChB. Evidence-Based Practice: How to Evaluate What You Read. Psychopharmacology Bulletin.
2004/02/27; 37(4):88-91.
https://doi.org/10.64719/pb.4165
